Netflix considers Fortnite its main competitor Leave a comment

Large film companies are increasingly starting their platforms for broadcasting films and series. It would seem, Netflix It is precisely such competitors that the company has lost 20 % of its content last year, because NBC Universal And Disney We recalled licenses for their own services, writes Game Informer. However, in fact Netflix More worried about Fortnite.

Netflix Published a fresh report for shareholders. The company said that it considers its main competitor Fortnite, not HBO. The latter produces serial monsters of rental "Games of Thrones" And "Wild West World". Moreover, Netflix admits that it is often inferior Fortnite In the battle for user attention.

As Game Infromer adds, Netflix currently has 139 million subscribers, and Fortnite – 200 million registered users. But if you compare the active audience, the alignment will change: in Fortnite About 80 million people come in every month, and 100 million people in Netflix.

Only in Fortnite, The author of Game Informer believes, the people are more willing to be more willing: people are well awaiting what “expirins” they are waiting in the game, while in Netflix you can poke into a random film and remain disappointed.

January 18, 2019 150 corrections for the last week – Bethesda continues to treat Fallout 76

January 18, 2019 Endless Legend and Endless Space 2 are preparing for new additions with aggressive mushrooms and espionage

The best comments

Will not blame, of course, but psychological discomfort will remain. And next time the viewer subconsciously can choose what he is one hundred percent sure of.

Nichrome to yourself. Now it turns out Netflix is ​​to blame for the fact that the viewer did not like the film on his platform? A very stupid comparison. FORNET – a game that is played for a long time those who already like it. It does not change from time to time. Nonflick – a platform on which you can watch films and TV shows. Even if you did not like the Netflix production series, you may like another. What kind of viewer after a bad film will blame the site on which he watched him?

They compete in their free time. It https://luckymanorcasino.uk/games/ is not rubber for the user, so it is very likely to go either to Fortnite or in Netflix. And since Netflix loses Fortnite by the predictability of the quantity of the fan, in a situation of this choice, Netflix is ​​inferior to Fortnite.

You plunge into too complicated matter. The average Vasyan bursts home after work and wants to wind up under some kind of junkie. “Interesting stories, dramatic experiences, immersion in someone’s fate”-these are the same entertainers in the evening, as well as the race with roots in Fordnight.

Okay, you don’t believe me, but why don’t you believe Netflix yourself? If she says that she competes with Fortnight, and even loses, then she has significant reasons for that.

Given that he is buying obviously disastrous films from large film companies, I’m not sure that Netflix has everything good with quality. Even in the South Park was ridiculed for this.

To some extent yes. Netfliks strives to increase content too much, seeks to make it so that he has as many films and series as possible. I believe that if the emphasis was shifted from the number of quality, the number of disappointed spectators would decrease.

I believe that if the emphasis was shifted from the number of quality, the number of disappointed spectators would decrease

Like the number of viewers in general.

Well, this is Sapkovsky – an idiot, not nonflick x *** I.
Where, by the way, you can watch the first season "Witcher"? He already went out?)

I am interested in age and sex tsa. IMHO, there is 20% of the total audience there.

I didn’t understand something. Why did they become competitors? Different things. It’s like if the grocery store became a competitor to the clothing store.

This fan is too different that one becomes a competitor of the other.
Fortnite is unable to provide the consumer with an interesting story, dramatic experiences, is unable to dip in someone else’s fate. And Netflix is ​​unable to entertain users to confront each other.

I do not believe it because I don’t have it so “just want entertainment”, if I want a film – I am looking for a suitable film, if I want a game, I am going through the Library of Steam. At the same time, from time to time I watch films and play games, one another does not replace for the simple reason that it gives different experience and different emotions. Sometimes I want what only the game is able to give, sometimes what can only be obtained from the film. These are very different entertainments. With the same success we can say that bars are competitors Netflix, because people tired after work go to the Bar beer, instead of watching Netflix. According to this logic, even sex is a competitor Netflix.

Also IMHO, but the same HBO, CBC, Hulu has more a common audience with Netflix than Netflix with Fordnite.
By the way, I enter these 20%.

Netflix has a great selection in quality. The problem is different: everyone cannot please everyone and everyone. What one user will like, may not like another, no matter how high quality this content may be. This problem is solved by algorithms that calculate what films or series will like a specific user. A selection based on these algorithms is put to the most prominent places – just in order to reduce the chance of random poke into a film that the user will not like.

But there is always a chance that the algorithm will be mistaken. Fortnite does not have such a problem. The game is constant in the character of his fan, so the user always knows that he will receive now.

Why would? “There” schoolchildren with nonflicks use very actively, and parents no less actively buy more expensive subscriptions so that you can watch their favorite series, while their children in the next room look at something under their preferences ..